Re: gvfs, samba

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

Chavdar Ivanov <ci4ic4%gmail.com@localhost> writes:

>> Now, I see samba is optional in gvfs, and I wonder:
>>
>>   should we flip it to off
>>   should we change it to samba4
>
> I don't know the right decision, but it is annoying if one builds gvfs
> as a dependency to get samba3 forced upon; I'd think if switching to
> samba4 is not very hard, to do just that, perhaps as an option.

Given samba3 is so crufty, I will just flip it to 4.  If people want to
vote for no samba by default.

I'm ok with leaving samba3 in pkgsrc for a while if people really want
it, but I don't think it should be depended on by default.