Re: pkgin - is this the expected behaviour?

[Jonathan Perkin <jperkin%joyent.com@localhost>]

* On 2020-12-27 at 17:23 GMT, Jonathan Perkin wrote:

> * On 2020-12-27 at 17:18 GMT, Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
> 
> > I had sbcl-2.0.7 installed and modified my local pkgsrc copy to use
> > 2.0.11, then I updated the pkgin database file on the build server and
> > tried to upgrade one of the clients, which already had sbcl-2.0.7
> > installed. 'pkgin update' got he new database, 'pkgin upgrade' didn't
> > do anything; 'pkgin avail | grep sbcl' correctly displayed the two
> > available packages. Removing sbcl-2.0.7 and reinstalling with 'pkgin
> > install sbcl' again installed 2.0.7, so apparently the order is
> > alphabetic, not number. I had to 'pkgin install sbcl-2.0.11' .
> 
> Do they have the same PKGPATH?  If yes, this may be related to
> NetBSDfr/pkgin#108.

Can you try applying this patch:

  https://github.com/NetBSDfr/pkgin/commit/4653f3cb484cc8f36d5b02fd4a459d54a4cd511a

and verify it now works as expected?

Thanks,

-- 
Jonathan Perkin  -  Joyent, Inc.  -  www.joyent.com