Re: procfs difference between NetBSD and Linux

[nia <nia%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 08:19:53PM +0100, David Brownlee wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 23:05, Mark Davies <mark%ecs.vuw.ac.nz@localhost> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2/06/21 8:32 am, Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
> > > I force-downgraded samba 4.14.4 to 4.13.9 (itself released recently,
> > > 11th of May). It works as expected.
> > > The cvs diff with respect to the current pkgsrc version is attached,
> > > in case someone else hits the same problem. Surely the other packages
> > > using samba should be also rebuilt - and database/ldb uninstalled, as
> > > it conflicts with samba 4.13.9.
> > >
> > > I basically just changed the package version in the Makefile, removing
> > > references to database/ldb; edited the distinfo file and ran 'make
> > > distinfo'. The PLIST was also manually adjusted.
> >
> > Yeah, locally I reverted to 4.13.7 which was the last 4.13 version in
> > pkgsrc.  Just added an additional patch to make it happy to use the
> > latest ldb, but if we are actually reverting samba in pkgsrc we should
> > probably revert ldb as well.
> 
> Maybe add 4.13.7 plus your patch to pkgsrc-wip, so anyone using samba4
> from pkgsrc current on netbsd-9 has an easy way to get a working
> system pending the kernel pullup?
> 
> David

This really isn't good enough, we're about to do a stable release
of pkgsrc with broken samba. Samba should be fixed before we cut
the release, we can't tell people not to use binary packages because
they're broken.