Cygnus X-1 <vms%retrobsd.ddns.net@localhost> writes: > Well, since not all Solaris are created equal, and I haven't seen > any reference to pkgsrc on Solaris 11 recently, I think it's worth > noticing that pkgsrc-2022Q1 bootstraps and works perfectly on Solaris > 11.4 using SunStudio 12.6 as compiler. Please place an updated README.Solaris in wip/bootstrap. > I think Illumos and Solaris have diverged enough to be considered > different platforms. Even within the illumos ecosystem there are > non-negligible differences between distributions. pkgsrc maps systems to a mk/platform/${platform}.mk so if Solaris and illumos use the same platform/foo.mk file, they are the same platform, by definition, and then there are within-platform differences accomodated there. However, "egrep -R llumos ." in mk does not match any code. I lean to thinking that our README.${platform} should exactly mirror that naming and if not it's a bug. Currently this is platform/SunOS.mk and bootstrap/README.Solaris If you want to propose a split into platform/Solaris and platform/Ilumos, that's a big change and would need rationale on tech-pkg. But I am unaware of a problem that it would solve. > I have a working pkgsrc-2021Q4 tree on Minix 3.4.0rc6 (latest and > possibly last developer preview). Using the `pkgin_sets' script to > install the toolchain (clang 3.6), and the developer tools first is a > requirement. From then, one can do `bmake update' to get the most recent > version of pkgtools/pkg_install and so on. I successfully built several > packages which weren't available in the official repo with little to no > trouble. Thanks. Please review what I just put in README.Minix3 and if it's not right, please put a fixed version in wip/bootstrap.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature