Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/fonts/Azeret

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

Jörg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost> writes:

> On Saturday, April 27, 2024 1:17:25 PM GMT+2 Greg Troxel wrote:
>>   we need to think about splitting all packages that have multiple
>
> Depending on the font engine used to draw them, OTF vs TTF matters,
> especially as quite a few programs can't handle e.g. multimaster fonts.
> That said, I don't see any reason for making this more complicated than
> necessary, so picking the most "modern" format certainly works.

I only meant "if we want to have a rigorous policy that font packges are
foo-format".   I am ok with a font package being named for upstream
distfile and having otf and ttf both, with the minor downside that
anybody that wants one suffers the disk space of both.