Re: Package naming when no backward compatibility at all?

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

"J. Lewis Muir" <jlmuir%imca-cat.org@localhost> writes:

> Of course, this is just for EPICS, not for modules nor extensions, but
> at the same time, people that write the modules or extensions might have
> a similar software development philosophy because they're part of that
> community, which is why I was planning to do a revbump for every module
> and extension as well to be safe.  What do you think?

I think you should package it in wip, just the latest, unversioned, and
see how it goes, rather than worrying about what might happen.  Really,
just start.  It's not helpful to require a plan cast in stone before
starting.