Port-bebox archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: powerpc/pic/intr.c IPL_HIGH vs IPL_NONE
Hi! macallan@ and all,
I apologize multi-post.
I add more descriptions.
-------
My bebox hangs up at boot time since change v 1.23 pic/intr.c.
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/arch/powerpc/pic/intr.c.diff?r1=1.22&r2=1.23&only_with_tag=MAIN&f=h
The hangup reason is changing imask[IPL_HIGH] to 0x3ffe0000 from 0x7ffe0000.
The bit30 indicate establish PIC I8259 with IPL_NONE on bebox.
sys/arch/bebox/bebox/machdep.c:cpu_startup() ---
/*
* set up i8259 as a cascade on BeInterruptController irq 26.
*/
intr_establish(16 + 26, IST_LEVEL, IPL_NONE, pic_handle_intr, isa_pic);
intr_establish() sets IPL_HIGH to is->is_ipl in powerpc/pic/intr.c.
However it sets IPL_NONE to ih->ih_ipl.
sys/arch/powerpc/pic/intr.c:intr_establish() ---
int maxipl = ipl;
if (maxipl == IPL_NONE)
maxipl = IPL_HIGH;
:
ih->ih_ipl = ipl;
:
is->is_ipl = maxipl;
Index: intr.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sys/arch/powerpc/pic/intr.c,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -r1.22 -r1.23
--- intr.c 7 Jun 2012 04:37:09 -0000 1.22
+++ intr.c 31 Aug 2012 13:12:52 -0000 1.23
@@ -362,7 +363,9 @@
/* First, figure out which ipl each IRQ uses. */
for (irq = 0, is = intrsources; irq < NVIRQ; irq++, is++) {
- newmask[is->is_ipl] |= PIC_VIRQ_TO_MASK(irq);
+ for (ih = is->is_hand; ih != NULL; ih = ih->ih_next) {
+ newmask[ih->ih_ipl] |= PIC_VIRQ_TO_MASK(irq);
+ }
}
/*
Shall we call intr_establish() with IPL_HIGH?
Or more better idea?
Also I think, this problem happen on sandpoint(ENCPP1, SANDPOINT).
In the first place, I don't understand this commit log by macallon@.
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/arch/powerpc/pic/intr.c.diff?r1=1.22&r2=1.23&only_with_tag=MAIN&f=h
when calculating per-IPL virq masks, take into account that shared IRQs may
request different IPLs.
fixes vr(4)-related problems seen on ofppc
The is->is_ipl is always set maxipl for shared IRQs. What problem is this?
Thanks,
--
kiyohara
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index