Subject: Re: 1.5.1(ish) and ^C
To: Martin Husemann <martin@duskware.de>
From: David Brownlee <abs@netbsd.org>
List: port-sparc64
Date: 06/27/2001 12:38:26
To follow up on my own reply...
A 1.5.1 kernel without DEBUG does not boot on my ultra1 - so it
looks like I'll be taking Martin's -current kernel with COMPAT_15
route :)
Somewhat entertainingly the sparc64 gcc will not compile perl
with -mcpu=v8, (or v9, sparclet or sparclite), while a sun4m
sparc can. I think I'll just avoid -mcpu on my ultra for now :/
--
David/absolute -- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, David Brownlee wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Martin Husemann wrote:
>
> > > sigreturn14: pc 0x478fdc0 or npc 0x1 invalid
> > > A 'c' continues.
> >
> > I've seen this myself and can confirm that it is fixed in current.
> >
> Good to hear... still worrying for the 1.5.1 release...
>
> > > Is there any chance of a pullup into the 1.5 branch, or maybe
> > > even just a LAST_MINUTE for 1.5.1 sparc64 to compile GENERIC
> > > without DEBUG? (Compiling to test now :)
> >
> > This may sound strange, but best thing to do is probably put some current
> > kernel with COMPAT_15 into it. This is *far* more stable.
>
> I'd thought about that (its how I play with current on my laptop),
> but wanted to try the release first - thanks!
>
>