On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 10:31:47AM -0400, Brian Hechinger wrote: > On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 03:00:11PM +0000, Eduardo Horvath wrote: > > > > It means that the bootblock does not support LFS. > > that's what i was afraid of. is there a bootblock for sparc64 that does > support LFS? > No. Someone would have to write one. Eduardo