Subject: Re: questions about pf import
To: Chris Ross <cross+netbsd@distal.com>
From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@itojun.org>
List: port-sparc64
Date: 06/30/2004 14:20:55
>> it IS core part of PF. see spamd(8) and see interaction between
>> kernel PF and spamd on the userland.
>
> Even if it's distributed with pf, that doesn't mean it's part
>of it. While it may be of little use without pf, you don't
>need it at all to use pf, and unless you're doing SMTP mail
>with your machine running pf, it's not even used, correct?
>To me, that suggests it need not be installed on every NetBSD
>machine in the world...
then why are we shipping sendmail and postfix in the default
installation? why are we shipping cvs even though netbsd is
used by non-developer? why are we shipping ssh even though
netbsd machine could run by itself (without any remote login)?
you're making accusation with no concrete thought. it's meaningless.
itojun
PS: this would be the last response on this topic.