--jCrbxBqMcLqd4mOl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

hi,

On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 07:12:53PM +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote:
> >But a little question, the default gcc seems to be 2.95.3
> >(/usr/bin/gcc) Also there seems to be version 3.3.4
> >(/usr/pkg/gcc3/bin/gcc). Suggestions, should I use the 3.3.4 as
> >default? I think some programs from the pkgsrc used the newer
> >version...
>=20
> depends on your needs. if you want to go into production, i'd stick
> with 2.95.

on sparc64, *anything* is better than 2.95, especially true for C++.

> if you want to play with some new compiler settings and so on, try 3.3
> (maybe you want to rebuild the whole system w/3.3?).

you can't rebuild netbsd-1-6 with 3.3, the build system will use its own
compiler, which is 2.95.

> perhaps you want to go testing 2.0BETA?

that's probably the best thing to do at this time, it should work much
better on sparc64 than netbsd-1-6.


regards,

--=20
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@{NetBSD,Xtrmntr,silcnet}.org>   --

--jCrbxBqMcLqd4mOl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFBFRaXiwjDDlS8cmMRAjeBAJ0R327odC63U7BzxebEEuyxXWfrKgCfaCVS
cSVr2M8lVRHyLUMbWVktbc8=
=hmuy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jCrbxBqMcLqd4mOl--