Sad but true... atleast you're using an AMD and not an Intel.  SMP is important, very important, it needs to be worked on.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Kelly <rmk@toad.rmkhome.com>
Sent: Feb 22, 2005 3:51 PM
To: James Cornell <unixpenguin2004@earthlink.net>
Cc: port-sparc64@NetBSD.org
Subject: Re: NetBSD Sparc64 SMP

James Cornell said:

>Hmm... SMP is more important then X IMOH.  I bought this machine specifically for
>server usage, so it won't be running X anytime soon.  Anyways... whatever the case,
>I'll use Solaris if Sparc64 SMP NetBSD remains unavailable.  I won't be getting 
>rid of the machine anytime soon, so even if I have to wait until 2007 for NetBSD
>4 or whatever, then it doesn't really matter.

When it comes to replacing my servers, yes, SMP is very important. I already
have Solaris 8 and one Solaris 2.6 box on my network, that is my only other
choice for my network besides NetBSD. 

However, an Ultra box with fvwm, mozilla, and openoffice could replace the
AMD Thunderbird that I'm sitting in front of. A box that has enough fans to
almost become airborne just keeping it down to a sane temperature.
-- 
Rick Kelly	rmk@rmkhome.com
		http://www.rmkhome.com/
		http://rkba.rmkhome.com/