Subject: Re: Ultra 10, Ultra 5 workstation questions.
To: Andras Barna <andras.barna@gmail.com>
From: Michael Lorenz <macallan@netbsd.org>
List: port-sparc64
Date: 11/19/2007 09:43:22
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On Nov 19, 2007, at 07:08, Andras Barna wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2007 10:38 AM, Gary Parker <G.J.Parker@lboro.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>> On 19 Nov 2007, at 08:29, Andrew Ball wrote:
>>> Can Ultra 10 and Ultra 5 workstations take ATA drives that
>>> are larger than 120 Gbytes capacity?
>>
>> Yes, my U10 is running a 160GB drive at the moment.
>>
>>> How slow is the ATA
>>> interface on these machines?
>>
>> Very :( They only do ATA33 with no DMA. If disk IO is important to
>> you pop a SCSI adapter in there and nice fast drive.
>>
>
> No DMA? hmm in dmesg i see:
>
> wd0 at atabus0 drive 0: <ST34321A>
> wd0: drive supports 32-sector PIO transfers, LBA addressing
> wd0: 4103 MB, 8894 cyl, 15 head, 63 sec, 512 bytes/sect x 8404830
> sectors
> wd0: drive supports PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2, Ultra-DMA mode 2 (Ultra/
> 33)
> wd0(cmdide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2 (using DMA)
That means the drive supports UDMA33 but the controller doesn't so it
falls back to PIO4/DMA2 which gives a theoretical maximum transfer
rate of about 16MB/s.
> well.. copying from network with ~6MB/s internal (read-write) is
> ~4-5MB/s
Since it's a rather old drive the bottleneck is probably not the IDE
controller.
have fun
Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
iQEVAwUBR0GhCspnzkX8Yg2nAQJEkwf+MoRPWBFNxjE4+S2OKGeRg5GhCMKCtDLz
RYvfXDFEtrrMCUM7CvdvkAhCmQJZLiJTLOSjlLk0tKaXO88ELuVcik/sjxrfjCe0
dfep0cGAQsZYrtnGeaJ2X/5dzMU3BQUGWu4b+RfgBHek+PdHECxqh0pgd0cObmGQ
flnk15iQMD8SpiwJDR9Hk5Sy1cY4pNoneimT/5tNzBKVTLj2xl4j1Q1D5j1XwnoP
R1Ybmmi5aqZ/jbquwz3LnML/Yv+hMdLnHUNc5oVDwRR8xMw6kWHGQNU98XLwf9mh
gAy2GerfDdJVAavsODY0LIv6NEtbioPfS0ql92K50eEw8x7nK4VRWg==
=C00p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----