Re: Re: Re: NetBSD version in Xenolinux ?

[Pavel Cahyna <pavel.cahyna%st.cuni.cz@localhost>]

On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 17:47:43 +0000, Joel CARNAT wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 08 2004 - 18:25, Michael Kukat wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Joel CARNAT wrote:
>> 
>> It's not a big surprise about Linux not having clue about ffs, but NetBSD
>> having clue (and i heard even the better implementation) of ext2 :)
>> 
> 
>  I won't start the "pinguins are food" debate here :p
>  Anyway, I don't really know about "goodness" of NetBSD/ext2
>  implementation. What I saw from experience is that ext3 formatted

I had a panic once with ext2 mounted read-write because of filling the
filesystem.

>  partition are (or where when I test a year ago) _really_ slower than
>  seen on the linux OS.
>  maybe because the ext3 was treated as ext2 by netbsd...

Exactly.

Bye     Pavel