Port-xen archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: lfence?
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost> writes:
> Yes, this can be an issue. I've run in such issues in other parts of
> the kernel already.
Does the attached patch look reasonable?
--
(let ((C call-with-current-continuation)) (apply (lambda (x y) (x y)) (map
((lambda (r) ((C C) (lambda (s) (r (lambda l (apply (s s) l)))))) (lambda
(f) (lambda (l) (if (null? l) C (lambda (k) (display (car l)) ((f (cdr l))
(C k))))))) '((#\J #\d #\D #\v #\s) (#\e #\space #\a #\i #\newline)))))
Index: arch/xen/include/cpufunc.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sys/arch/xen/include/cpufunc.h,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.11 cpufunc.h
--- arch/xen/include/cpufunc.h 6 Mar 2006 19:54:14 -0000 1.11
+++ arch/xen/include/cpufunc.h 14 Mar 2006 22:40:53 -0000
@@ -62,9 +62,9 @@ x86_lfence(void)
{
/*
- * XXX it's better to use real lfence insn if available.
+ * Xen requires a P6, so we can use an actual lfence.
*/
- __asm volatile("lock; addl $0, 0(%%esp)" : : : "memory");
+ __asm volatile("lfence" : : : "memory");
}
static __inline void
@@ -72,9 +72,20 @@ x86_sfence(void)
{
/*
- * nothing to do at the CPU level, just put a barrier for compiler
+ * Xen requires a P6, so we can use an actual sfence.
+ * Allegedly, CPUs now exist where sfence isn't a no-op.
*/
- __insn_barrier();
+ __asm volatile("sfence" : : : "memory");
+}
+
+static __inline void
+x86_mfence(void)
+{
+
+ /*
+ * Xen requires a P6, so we can use an actual mfence.
+ */
+ __asm volatile("mfence" : : : "memory");
}
#ifdef _KERNEL
Index: arch/xen/xen/clock.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sys/arch/xen/xen/clock.c,v
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -p -r1.18 clock.c
--- arch/xen/xen/clock.c 7 Mar 2006 23:08:14 -0000 1.18
+++ arch/xen/xen/clock.c 14 Mar 2006 22:40:53 -0000
@@ -82,29 +82,29 @@ get_time_values_from_xen(void)
uint32_t tversion;
do {
tversion = t->version;
- __insn_barrier();
+ x86_lfence();
shadow_tsc_stamp = t->tsc_timestamp;
shadow_system_time = t->system_time;
- __insn_barrier();
+ x86_lfence();
} while ((t->version & 1) || (tversion != t->version));
do {
tversion = HYPERVISOR_shared_info->wc_version;
- __insn_barrier();
+ x86_lfence();
shadow_tv.tv_sec = HYPERVISOR_shared_info->wc_sec;
shadow_tv.tv_usec = HYPERVISOR_shared_info->wc_nsec;
- __insn_barrier();
+ x86_lfence();
} while ((HYPERVISOR_shared_info->wc_version & 1) ||
(tversion != HYPERVISOR_shared_info->wc_version));
shadow_tv.tv_usec = shadow_tv.tv_usec / 1000;
#else /* XEN3 */
do {
shadow_time_version = HYPERVISOR_shared_info->time_version2;
- __insn_barrier();
+ x86_lfence();
shadow_tv.tv_sec = HYPERVISOR_shared_info->wc_sec;
shadow_tv.tv_usec = HYPERVISOR_shared_info->wc_usec;
shadow_tsc_stamp = HYPERVISOR_shared_info->tsc_timestamp;
shadow_system_time = HYPERVISOR_shared_info->system_time;
- __insn_barrier();
+ x86_lfence();
} while (shadow_time_version != HYPERVISOR_shared_info->time_version1);
#endif
}
Index: arch/xen/xen/ctrl_if.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sys/arch/xen/xen/ctrl_if.c,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -p -r1.12 ctrl_if.c
--- arch/xen/xen/ctrl_if.c 15 Jan 2006 22:09:52 -0000 1.12
+++ arch/xen/xen/ctrl_if.c 14 Mar 2006 22:40:54 -0000
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ __ctrl_if_rxmsg_deferred(void *unused)
while (1) {
s = splsoftnet();
dp = ctrl_if_rxmsg_deferred_prod;
- __insn_barrier(); /* Ensure we see all requests up to 'dp'. */
+ x86_lfence(); /* Ensure we see all requests up to 'dp'. */
if (ctrl_if_rxmsg_deferred_cons == dp) {
tsleep(&ctrl_if_rxmsg_deferred_cons, PRIBIO,
"rxdef", 0);
Index: arch/xen/xen/if_xennet.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sys/arch/xen/xen/if_xennet.c,v
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -u -p -r1.43 if_xennet.c
--- arch/xen/xen/if_xennet.c 6 Mar 2006 22:04:18 -0000 1.43
+++ arch/xen/xen/if_xennet.c 14 Mar 2006 22:40:54 -0000
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ xennet_interface_status_change(netif_fe_
* we've probably just requeued some packets.
*/
sc->sc_backend_state = BEST_CONNECTED;
- __insn_barrier();
+ x86_sfence();
hypervisor_notify_via_evtchn(status->evtchn);
network_tx_buf_gc(sc);
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index