Re: pf as a module for XEN3_DOM0

To: Chris Dukes <pakrat%private.neotoma.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: pf as a module for XEN3_DOM0
From: Arnaud Lacombe <lists-netbsd%sigfpe.info@localhost>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:16:32 +0200

On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 11:31:15AM -0400, Chris Dukes wrote:
> I'd like an answer to this, but I ended up just re-building the kernel
> with PF.
> 
Has Xen been converted to timecounter ? only sparc, amd64, prep and i386
seems to have __HAVE_TIMECOUNTER defined. It would explain why
`time_second' is missing in time_tc.o as its definition is wrapped
around #ifdef __HAVE_TIMECOUNTER ... #endif

regards,

Arnaud

References:
- pf as a module for XEN3_DOM0
  - From: Juraj Hercek
- Re: pf as a module for XEN3_DOM0
  - From: Chris Dukes

Prev by Date: Re: pf as a module for XEN3_DOM0
Next by Date: XEN3_DOM0 diskless can't seem to receive packets
Previous by Thread: Re: pf as a module for XEN3_DOM0
Next by Thread: XEN3_DOM0 diskless can't seem to receive packets
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index