Re: isolated "internal" network?

[Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%rek.tjls.com@localhost>]

On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 07:50:46AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> 
> Probably lo(4) needs bridge support, and adding that would be the
> right thing really.

I think this is a terrible idea.  Why should we force loopback to
emulate an Ethernet device just so we can bridge it?  It is not an
Ethernet device and we should not pretend that it is one.

Thor