On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 10:57:04AM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote: > > It's possible that this has changed with Xen3.?With Xen2 I'm sure using > 0x300 didn't work; the linux kernel simply didn't read the partition table > from the virtal disk. Wait, 0x300 actually means something? What does it mean? I've just been numbering the disks 0x1, 0x2, etc... the galaxy hasn't exploded yet, so i figured i was okay... --david > > -- > Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI. > Manuel.Bouyer%lip6.fr@localhost > NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference > --
Attachment:
pgpJygFbN40xo.pgp
Description: PGP signature