On Friday 14 September 2007 12:15:38 Sarton O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 09:24:19 pm Juan RP wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:30:11 +0300
> >
> > Mikolaj Golub <to.my.trociny@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:13:40 +1000 Sarton O'Brien wrote:
> > >
> > >  SO> I just realised I don't know how to tell what version of ffs I am
> > >  SO> using.
> > >
> > > You can use dumpfs(8) for this.
> >
> > And scan_ffs(8).
>
> Umm ... which one is right??
>
> $ df /dev/wd0a
> Filesystem   1K-blocks        Used      Avail %Cap Mounted on
> /dev/wd0a       198831      45824     143066  24% /
>
> $ dumpfs /dev/wd0a|grep -i ffs
> cylgrp  dynamic inodes  4.4BSD  sblock  FFSv2   fslevel 4
>
> $ scan_ffs /dev/wd0
> Disk: WDC WD800JD-75M
> Total sectors on disk: 156250000
> FFSv1 at 63 size 410256, last mounted on /
>
> Now I'm just lost :P
>
> Seriously though is there something else I can use to point the finger at
> which one is wrong?

dumpfs is correct. scan_ffs was imported from OpenBSD at a time, there
was no FFSv2 support in OpenBSD. Now OpenBSD supports FFSv2.
=> scan_ffs needs re-imported.

Christoph