Re: xm create failure

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 03:55:47PM +0200, Mihai Chelaru wrote:
> On Friday 07 March 2008 12:53:11 Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > Is it a custom kernel ? Next step would be to see where in the kernel
> > 0xc0394759 is (use gdb l *(0xc0394759) or disas 0xc0394759),
> > and evenrtally do the same for the addresses printed in the stack trace.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> It's a stable 4 generic kernel + 2 xen pullups you requested and not commited 
> yet.
> 
> (gdb) disas 0xc0394759
> Dump of assembler code for function xpmap_get_bootpte:
> 0xc0394750 <xpmap_get_bootpte+0>:       push   %ebp
> 0xc0394751 <xpmap_get_bootpte+1>:       mov    %esp,%ebp
> 0xc0394753 <xpmap_get_bootpte+3>:       call   0xc03946f0 <xpmap_get_bootptep>
> 0xc0394758 <xpmap_get_bootpte+8>:       pop    %ebp
> 0xc0394759 <xpmap_get_bootpte+9>:       mov    (%eax),%eax
> 0xc039475b <xpmap_get_bootpte+11>:      ret
> 0xc039475c <xpmap_get_bootpte+12>:      lea    0x0(%esi),%esi
> End of assembler dump.

Hum, xpmap_get_bootptep() returned -1. If I got it right from the register
dump, it was called for 0xc9ebc000

I can't reproduce this; can you send me your xen config, and eventually your
kernel binary ?

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--