Port-xen archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest
On Friday 15 August 2008 10:49:16 Christoph Egger wrote:
> On Friday 15 August 2008 10:18:31 Christoph Egger wrote:
> > On Thursday 14 August 2008 23:39:23 Christoph Egger wrote:
> > > Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 08:25:14PM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
> > > >>> Not really, as the write which is failing is also in dom0 (so on
> > > >>> the same CPU). I think the tlb should be properly invalidated. Just
> > > >>> to make sure you can try adding
> > > >>> pmap_tlb_shootdown(pmap, va, 0, opte);
> > > >>> just after xpq_update_foreign() in pmap_enter_ma(). But as we're
> > > >>> switching pmaps on return to userland, this shouldn't be needed.
> > > >>
> > > >> This has no impact.
> > > >
> > > > As expected ... I'm running out of idea. I'll try to reproduce this
> > > > on my test box, but it won't be before next week.
> > >
> > > I found the bug:
> > > >>>>> - instrument privpgop_fault() to see if it gets called at all
> > > >>>>> for this mapping, and if it's doing the right thing.
> > > >>>>> There should be only one page in this object, and the machine
> > > >>>>> address should be 0 (pobj->maddr[maddr_i])
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Yes, privpgop_fault() is called. It looks like it's called in a
> > > >>>> loop. npages = 1 and machine address is 0.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> OK, it has the right data. I guess it's called in a loop because
> > > >>> writing at the page keeps failing.
> > >
> > > Writing at the page keeps failing because privpgop_fault()
> > > does not handle this case:
> > >
> > > if (pobj->maddr[maddr_i] == 0)
> > > continue; /* this has already been flagged as error */
> > >
> > > Removing this makes privpgop_fault() calling pmap_enter_ma()
> > > and that makes the write access finally succeed and the HVM guest
> > > starts.
> > >
> > > May I commit this change?
> >
> > The story is not over yet. When running a HVM guest, the machine
> > suddenly freezes with this message:
> >
> > Mutex error: mutex_spin_retry: locking against myself
> >
> > lock address : 0xffffffff80b86a80
> > current cpu : 0
> > current lwp : 0xffffa000257e47e0
> > owner field : 0x0000000000010700 wait/spin: 0/1
> >
> > The machine freezes absolutely: No keyboard interrupt, no serial console
> > and no network is working. The machine can't be pinged from outside.
> >
> >
> > What I figured out so far:
> >
> > a) I can only reproduce this with / on nfs. (So is this NetBSD/Xen
> > specific? ) b) The values are always the same.
>
> A LOCKDEBUG Dom0 kernel panics with this:
>
> Mutex error: mutex_vector_enter: locking against myself
>
> lock address : 0xffffa00023206f48 type : spin
> initialized : 0xffffffff803f5dee
> shared holds : 0 exclusive: 0
> shares wanted: 0 exclusive: 1
> current cpu : 0 last held: 0
> current lwp : 0xffffa000260247c0 last held: 000000000000000000
> last locked : 0xffffffff80407e00 unlocked : 0xffffffff80407e7e
> owner field : 0x0000000000010700 wait/spin: 0/1
>
> panic: LOCKDEBUG
> fatal breakpoint trap in supervisor mode
> trap type 1 code 0 rip ffffffff804b936d cs e030 rflags 246 cr2
> ffffa000256d5000 cpl 8 rsp ffffa000260b7088
> Stopped in pid 457.1 (qemu-dm) at netbsd:breakpoint+0x5: leave
> breakpoint() at netbsd:breakpoint+0x5
> panic() at netbsd:panic+0x255
> lockdebug_abort1() at netbsd:lockdebug_abort1+0xd3
> mutex_vector_enter() at netbsd:mutex_vector_enter+0x1f0
> sleepq_remove() at netbsd:sleepq_remove+0x107
> cv_wakeup_all() at netbsd:cv_wakeup_all+0x81
> knote_activate() at netbsd:knote_activate+0x84
> knote() at netbsd:knote+0x36
> selnotify() at netbsd:selnotify+0x25
> logwakeup() at netbsd:logwakeup+0x3f
> printf() at netbsd:printf+0xfc
> xen_correctable_handler() at netbsd:xen_correctable_handler+0x25
> Xresume_xenev8() at netbsd:Xresume_xenev8+0x55
> --- interrupt ---
> Xspllower() at netbsd:Xspllower+0xe
> mi_switch() at netbsd:mi_switch+0x12e
> sleepq_block() at netbsd:sleepq_block+0xa0
> selcommon() at netbsd:selcommon+0x738
> sys_select() at netbsd:sys_select+0x6a
> syscall() at netbsd:syscall+0x98
> ds 0x7414
> es 0x7098
> fs 0x7414
> gs 0x8
> rdi 0x8
> rsi 0xdeadbeef
> rbp 0xffffa000260b7088
> rbx 0xffffa000260b7098
> rdx 0
> rcx 0
> rax 0x1
> r8 0xffffa000260b6fa8
> r9 0x1
> r10 0xffffa000260b6fa8
> r11 0xffffffff804f5560 xenconscn_putc
> r12 0x100
> r13 0xffffffff80867414 copyright+0x1a254
> r14 0x8
> r15 0x1
> rip 0xffffffff804b936d breakpoint+0x5
> cs 0xe030
> rflags 0x246
> rsp 0xffffa000260b7088
> ss 0xe02b
> netbsd:breakpoint+0x5: leave
> db> ps /l
> PID LID S FLAGS STRUCT LWP * NAME WAIT
>
> >457 3 3 1000084 ffffa00025d067c0 qemu-dm aiowork
>
> 2 3 1000084 ffffa00026024000 qemu-dm netio
>
> > 1 3 40084 ffffa000260247c0 qemu-dm select
>
> [...]
>
> Christoph
This is a non-issue for those using -current from cvs. I have some local
changes adding some basic machine check support in order to test
the new machine check infrastructure in Xen 3.3.
On one certain machine, I have the strange effect that the
Dom0 machine check handler gets invoked w/o actually having
the hw NOT reporting an error. The error causing this LOCKDEBUG
panic is that I dump the error telemetry via printf() instead of
printf_nolog(). Using printf_nolog() actually fixes this
LOCKDEBUG panic.
Christoph
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index