Re: Xen/Xentools 3.3 Domain-Unnamed

[Christoph Egger <Christoph_Egger%gmx.de@localhost>]

On Tuesday 19 August 2008 17:32:09 Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:08:17 +0200, Manuel Bouyer 
> <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
>
> wrote:
> >> We could use it the other way around, no?
> >
> > Maybe, I was thinking about the function itself.
> > We'd have to check if it's complete first, and if it matches what
> > Xen uses. There seems to be port-dependant values here ...
>
> As far as I can say, for i386, they all match (see attach).
>
> My point being that linux has some arch-dependant errno, and we are
> hardcoding some of them for i386 here.
>
> But I don't know if Xen uses i386 errno for its others ports; I will check
> that.

Yes, it does. Xen's errno header is in a hypervisor internal but 
port-independent directory.

Christoph