Re: Renaming our Xen packages

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 02:54:34PM +0300, Martti Kuparinen wrote:
> Any comments on this?
> 
> Martti
> 
> 
> 
> Martti Kuparinen wrote:
> >
> >May I propose that we rename our Xen package directories and package 
> >names so that it's obvious which version it is just by looking at the 
> >package listing and/or directory name. This is what I mean:
> >
> >xen12:        shouldn't this be removed? If not, rename to xen12-kernel
> >xentools12:    shouldn't this be removed? If not, rename to xen12-tools

Can be removed

> >
> >xenkernel20:    rename to xen20-kernel
> >xentools20:    rename to xen20-tools
> >
> >xenkernel3:    rename to xen31-kernel
> >xentools3:    rename to xen31-tools
> >xentools3-hvm:    rename to xen31-tools-hvm
> >
> >xenkernel33:    rename to xen33-kernel
> >xentools33:    rename to xen33-tools
> >
> >All these packages, when installed, are just xen-{kernel,tools}-VERSION, 
> >e.g.
> >
> >xen-kernel-3.3.0nb1
> >xen-tools-3.3.0nb4
> >
> >I don't think this would be a problem as we already have CONFLICTS in 
> >place so only one version can be installed.

what will these renames buy us ? exept that 'make update' won't work
anymore ...

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--