Re: xennet: rx no mbuf

To: "Sam Fourman Jr." <sfourman%gmail.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: xennet: rx no mbuf
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:54:42 +0100

On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 06:32:00PM -0600, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> what is a good value for a machine with 50 - 100 domu's (64GB total
> system memory)
> 
>       options NMBCLUSTERS=3072 ??

It mostly depends on the number of physical and virtual interfaces.
I would make it 16384 or 32768.

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--

References:
- xennet: rx no mbuf
  - From: Emmanuel Dreyfus
- Re: xennet: rx no mbuf
  - From: Manuel Bouyer
- Re: xennet: rx no mbuf
  - From: Sam Fourman Jr.

Prev by Date: Re: xennet: rx no mbuf
Next by Date: Re: xennet: rx no mbuf
Previous by Thread: Re: xennet: rx no mbuf
Next by Thread: Re: xennet: rx no mbuf
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index