On 24 May 2010 09:11, Adam Hamsik <haaaad%gmail.com@localhost> wrote: > On May,Monday 24 2010, at 8:46 AM, Pouya D. Tafti wrote: [...] >> I also tried the patch on an Intel Core i5 and had a similar >> experience. ÂI could get further than before with 64-bit Linux >> binaries coming from a 64-bit Linux partition mounted at /emul/linux >> and ran with a fake raised kernel version. ÂGraphical programs >> eventually failed because they could not connect to the X server, >> complaining about the socket type being wrong for the protocol or >> something similar (which I did not figure out how to get around). ÂBut >> this was already quite promising, considering that with an unpatched >> kernel they just dump core. > > CAn you ktrace this process and post output here ? Sorry about my delay in responding. Please find ktrace outputs for unpatched and patched kernels attached. Pouya
Attachment:
ktrace.out.chromium-unpatched
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
ktrace.out.chromium-fsgs
Description: Binary data