Re: Specifying names for tap interfaces

[Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost>]

Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost> writes:

> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:51:13AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> 
>> It seems easy enough to add the ioctl and see if things blow up...
>
> You can be pretty sure ipf, pf, and npf will blow up.

Because they watch interface creation and keep matching state?  Or do
you just mean that rules written for tap3 will no longer match?

Attachment: pgpUNdhXxcStV.pgp
Description: PGP signature