Re: xenkernel42-4.2.4 DOM0 lost interrupt

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:30:03PM +0200, bobbisanchez%gmx.de@localhost wrote:
> Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> >On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 03:34:54AM +0200, Bobbi Sanchez wrote:
> >>>>netbsd:breakpoint+0x4:  popl    %ebp
> >>>>db>   c
> >>>Not sure what this is, a 'tr' would help here to see where this comes from
> >>>(but I'm not sure it's related to the interrupt problem)
> >>>
> >>thanks for the reply, sorry for so late ,
> >>
> >>i dont know i just type 'tr' and hit enter , thats right ?
> >yes,
> >
> >>db>  tr
> >>breakpoint(8,c0dabafc,0,3,0,0,10000,0,0,6000) at netbsd:breakpoint+0x4
> >>db>
> >that's strange, it should also at last show more than that.
> >There's been a discussion about frame pointers recently, maybe adding
> >makeoptions     COPTS="-O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer"
> >to your kernel config file would help ?
> >
> >>and the two bootlogs, first ist GENERIC the other XEN3_DOM0 with pae option
> >>GENERIC boot log:
> >thanks. Unfortunably, I can't see any obvious difference in ACPI handling
> >between the 2 kernels. I guess the problem is in Xen's ACPI handling, which
> >is an area I don't know much at all ...
> >
> Hi and thanks for your time.
> i tried to add
> 
> COPTS="-O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer"
> 
> in the XEN3_DOM0 Kernel config but the same Behavior .... still "lost
> interrupt"

that was to fix the ddb backtrace. For the lost interrupt issue I don't
have idea, sorry.

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--