Port-xen archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: what builds and what doesn't - worse than I expected
On 14/05/14 12:56, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 09:51:42AM -0700, John Nemeth wrote:
>>
>> On May 14, 10:25am, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>> } On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 07:17:59PM -0700, John Nemeth wrote:
>> } > On May 13, 3:58pm, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> } > }
>> } > } The HOWTO is out of date, and I wanted to make sure the right thing was
>> } > } recommended. My take is that the right recommendation now is
>> } > }
>> } > } xen: 4.1
>> } > } dom0: NetBSD 6 stable, amd64
>> } > }
>> } > } except that maybe it should be 4.2. I looked at package building
>> } >
>> } > Unless there is a very good reason to specify otherwise, I
>> } > would go with 4.2. There were a number of positive reports about
>> } > it after I imported it.
>> }
>> } I'm still using features from the xm toolstack which are not in xl in 4.2
>> ...
>>
>> And, what features are those?
>
> for example, options to xm shutdown (I don't remember right now if it's -a
> or -w, I do use both)
This was added in 4.3 and backported to 4.2 at least:
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-10/msg01103.html
Roger.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index