Re: interrupt cleanup #2

[Cherry G.Mathew <cherry%zyx.in@localhost>]

Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost> writes:

> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 10:38:28AM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>> I'm not sure why you're masking irq with 0xff as pirq.
>> Can't this lead to conflicts or false routing on systems with multiple
>> IOPICs ?
>
> please ignore I see we're already doing it. At this point irq has been
> computed again.

right, I was confused for a second again. Ok, so basically all I'm
trying to do upto this point is to reshuffle the api to line things up
so we can get a clear merge with native x86.

I'll get to those patch sets incrementally.

Thanks again for the review. 

-- 
~cherry