Port-xen archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Dom0 bad network performance
Hello Greg,
Am 13.02.21 um 17:15 schrieb Greg Troxel:
These are quite different! The values are more or less in the same
relationship as your tests using re0. But they are also far more than
the most-of-1Gb/s you might reasonably expect on an actual interface.
You might also try dd from /dev/zero to /dev/null. I'm seeing 16 GB/s
on a sort of old box, 8 GB/s on older hardware, and maybe 3 on a PC
Engines apu2. That should test the user/kernel data copying without
dragging TCP into it.
Using
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=4m
it performs like:
2,163,008,730 bytes/sec => ~ 2.2 GB/s (with Xen)
2,402,700,957 bytes/sec => ~ 2.4 GB/s (without Xen)
The difference here is not significant, but compared to your example
values on a lower level overall. This puts your question about the
specific hardware in a very special light. It is about this pretty low
end CPU built into a little NUC box:
[ 1.000003] ioapic0 at mainbus0 apid 1: pa 0xfec00000, version 0x20,
115 pins
[ 1.000003] cpu0 at mainbus0 apid 0
[ 1.000003] cpu0: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz, id 0x406c3
[ 1.000003] cpu0: package 0, core 0, smt 0
[ 1.000003] cpu1 at mainbus0 apid 4
[ 1.000003] cpu1: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz, id 0x406c3
[ 1.000003] cpu1: package 0, core 2, smt 0
[ 1.000003] acpi0 at mainbus0: Intel ACPICA 20190405
[ 1.000003] acpi0: X/RSDT: OemId <INTEL ,NUC5CPYB,0000004f>, AslId
<AMI ,00010013>
[ 1.000003] acpi0: autoconfiguration error: invalid PCI address for D026
[ 1.000003] acpi0: MCFG: segment 0, bus 0-255, address
0x00000000e0000000
I am running Xen 4.13 on 9-stable.
Anyway, I will continue to check the netstat output for my next test
according your proposal.
Kind regards
Matthias
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index