[src/netbsd-3-0]: src/doc tickets 1808, 1818, 1821

[bouyer <bouyer%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

details:   https://anonhg.NetBSD.org/src/rev/38874789c976
branches:  netbsd-3-0
changeset: 579440:38874789c976
user:      bouyer <bouyer%NetBSD.org@localhost>
date:      Sun Aug 26 20:04:55 2007 +0000

description:
tickets 1808, 1818, 1821

diffstat:

 doc/CHANGES-3.0.4 |  26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diffs (37 lines):

diff -r 4fe89ba7bec4 -r 38874789c976 doc/CHANGES-3.0.4
--- a/doc/CHANGES-3.0.4 Sun Aug 26 20:03:26 2007 +0000
+++ b/doc/CHANGES-3.0.4 Sun Aug 26 20:04:55 2007 +0000
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-#      $NetBSD: CHANGES-3.0.4,v 1.1.2.3 2007/08/14 10:35:38 ghen Exp $
+#      $NetBSD: CHANGES-3.0.4,v 1.1.2.4 2007/08/26 20:04:55 bouyer Exp $
 
 A complete list of changes from the NetBSD 3.0.3 release to the NetBSD 3.0.4
 release:
@@ -29,3 +29,27 @@
        Query id generation was cryptographically weak.
        [adrianp, ticket #1829]
 
+sys/sys/socketvar.h                            1.97
+       Fix a bug in sblock() that has existed since revision 1.1 from BSD:
+       correctly return an error if M_NOWAIT is passed to sblock() and the
+       operation might block.  This remarkably subtle macro bug appears to
+       be responsible for quite a few undiagnosed socket buffer corruption
+       and mbuf-related kernel panics.
+       [christos, ticket #1808]
+
+sbin/ping/ping.c                               1.83 - 1.85
+
+       PR/28741: Michael Santos: ping does [not] drop root privileges
+       [ghen, ticket #1818]
+
+lib/libc/gen/Makefile.inc                      1.143
+lib/libc/gen/cgetcap.3                         1.1 - 1.3
+lib/libc/gen/getcap.3                          delete
+
+       Both libcurses and libc installed a getcap(3) manpage, and both used it
+       as target for a bunch of MLINKS. This had the effect that whatever came
+       last in install overwrote everything from the other camp.
+       Solve this by renaming the libc page -- this makes sense because no
+       function is really named "getcap" here.
+       [bad, ticket #1821]
+