[src/trunk]: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1 tests/lint: fix typos in comment i...

[rillig <rillig%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

details:   https://anonhg.NetBSD.org/src/rev/1a781db2c58d
branches:  trunk
changeset: 984378:1a781db2c58d
user:      rillig <rillig%NetBSD.org@localhost>
date:      Mon Jul 05 19:43:29 2021 +0000

description:
tests/lint: fix typos in comment in expr_range

diffstat:

 tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/expr_range.c |  8 ++++----
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diffs (21 lines):

diff -r ebc8fbd043b3 -r 1a781db2c58d tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/expr_range.c
--- a/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/expr_range.c    Mon Jul 05 19:39:12 2021 +0000
+++ b/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/expr_range.c    Mon Jul 05 19:43:29 2021 +0000
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
-/*     $NetBSD: expr_range.c,v 1.2 2021/05/15 19:12:14 rillig Exp $    */
+/*     $NetBSD: expr_range.c,v 1.3 2021/07/05 19:43:29 rillig Exp $    */
 # 3 "expr_range.c"
 
 /*
  * In a switch statement that has (expr & constant) as the controlling
- * expression, complain if one of the case branches is unreachable because
- * the case label does can never match the controlling expression.
+ * expression, complain if a case branch is unreachable because the case
+ * label can never match the controlling expression.
  *
  * GCC 10 does not complain about the unreachable branch.  It knows that the
- * branch is unreachable though since it doesn't generate any code for it.
+ * branch is unreachable though, since it doesn't generate any code for it.
  * GCC once had the option -Wunreachable-code, but that option was made a
  * no-op in 2011.
  *