Source-Changes archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: sun-lamp CVS commits
[ On Mon, October 24, 1994 at 19:39:19 (-0400), Chris G. Demetriou wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: sun-lamp CVS commits
>
> (2) anyone with their own internal support -- a very small number of
> sites -- should disable bug reporting from end-users to their
> software distributors, and so this should not be a problem
> for them.
You seem to have a different view about the potential classes of users
for NetBSD than I do. I am part of a company that is now installing
NetBSD in commercial sites, many of which have *large* user bases, and
definitely have internal support organizations. We will definitely be
using GNATS, and we most definitely don't want end-users of those
systems sending PR's to NetBSD.org, nor IMHO, do you.
My personal hope is that NetBSD will soon be installed at a very large
number of sites with their own internal support. I would hope that
many, of not most, of those sites will choose to use GNATS.
Calling the "NetBSD send-pr" (i.e. the program with the purpose of
sending PR's to NetBSD.org) something related to that purpose (such as
netbsdbug, or netbsd-pr, etc.), and keeping the /usr/bin namespace clear
for a "local" version seems to me to be something worth doing.
> A better idea would be to get the people who maintain gnats to add
> reasonable support for use with multiple packages. There's actually
> some support already there to do this, but i dunno how much, and i
> dunno how much work would be needed to make it completely general.
It's not an easy problem to solve.
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 443-1734 VE3TCP robohack!woods
Planix, Inc. <woods%planix.com@localhost>; UniForum Canada
<woods%uniforum.ca@localhost>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index