On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 04:19:52PM +0000, David Laight wrote: > > Module Name: src > Committed By: dsl > Date: Tue Nov 4 16:19:52 UTC 2003 > > Modified Files: > src/sys/sys: proc.h > > Log Message: > Remove p_nras from struct proc - use LIST_EMPTY(&p->p_raslist) instead. > Remove p_raslock and rename p_lwplock p_lock (one lock is enough). > (pad fields left in struct proc to avoid kernel bump) Isn't it better to have to bump the kernel version than to waste memory (admittedly a tiny amount) on unused (and not likely to ever be used) fields in the structure? -Sean -- /~\ The ASCII \ / Ribbon Campaign Sean Davis X Against HTML aka dive / \ Email!
Attachment:
pgpdIdiHJtdmL.pgp
Description: PGP signature