Source-Changes archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src/sys/sys
> > I think what you want to do exactly is
> > "including declarations of struct disklabel and struct pattitions
> > without including <machine/disklabel.h>", right?
> > Then using MAXPARTITIONS or _MACHINE_DISKLABEL_H_ is
> > not correct even if it works for now.
> > It's still better to add declarations into sys/bootblock.h
> > to define info about target machines.
>
> Agreed. Or add it to sys/disklabel.h prefaced with the machine name:
>
> #define MAXPARTITIONS_HP300 8
>
> and then in <machine/disklabel.h> for hp300:
>
> #define MAXPARTITIONS MAXPARTITIONS_HP300
>
> This would even allow us to move forward on a disklabel library that
> understood the disklabel formats/offsets used by our various platforms.
In this case the code doesn't care about the value of MAXPARTITIONS.
It looks at label.d_npartitions ( validating against MAXMAXPARTITIONS).
All it wants is 'struct disklabel', doesn't care about the size.
I certainly agree that a disklabel library would be useful.
One reason I wanted to rip out the installboot stuff from disklabel
was to give a chance of restructuring the rest of the code a little.
The way it handles boot code makes it all too hard otherwise.
David
--
David Laight: david%l8s.co.uk@localhost
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index