Source-Changes archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src/sbin/sysctl
>> >> >Modified Files:
>> >> > src/sbin/sysctl: sysctl.8
>> >> >
>> >> >Log Message:
>> >> >Document net.bpf.maxbufsize in sysctl(8).
>> >> >NB: bpf isn't a PF_, so where to list it in sysctl(3)?
>> >>
>> >>hmm...good point. my first thought was that bpf had to do with
>> >>networking under the "net" sub-tree, but perhaps it fits better with
>> >>devices under the "dev" sub-tree?
>> >
>> >bpf should be use pseudo_AF_HDRCMPLT as it's address family since
>> >that exists mostly for bpf's usage. Calling that net.bpf seems fine
>> >to me.
>>
>>alternately, put bpf under net.unspec (CTL_NET.PF_UNSPEC)?
>
>Ewww. Unspec is a wildcard. Don't overload it.
i was thinking more about how bpf doesn't apply to any particular
protocol family, but operates on all of them. so to speak.
>CTL_NET.pseudo_AF_HDRCMPLT is the right choice for bpf.
pseudo_PF_HDRCMPLT perhaps (thought we'd have to add it)?
--
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior%daemon.org@localhost * "ah! i see you have the internet
twofsonet%graffiti.com@localhost (Andrew Brown) that goes
*ping*!"
werdna%squooshy.com@localhost * "information is power -- share the
wealth."
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index