Source-Changes archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/news68k/floppies/ramdisk
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 08:19:26PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> In article <20198.1080375229%splode.eterna.com.au@localhost>
> mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost wrote:
>
> > x_gzip is basically an old version of usr.bin/gzip. ideally the latter
> > can be updated to remove more features with -DSMALL and x_gzip has no
> > sources in it... things i can see off hand:
>
> I tried a quick patch which disables bzip2 and compress support by
> -DNO_BZIP2_SUPPORT and -DNO_COMPRESS_SUPPORT:
> ---
> % ls -lS gzip*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 100 100 218791 Mar 27 19:55 gzip-static
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 100 100 214652 Mar 27 19:55 gzip-static_without_compress
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 100 100 168745 Mar 27 19:55 gzip-static_without_bzip2
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 100 100 164478 Mar 27 19:56 gzip-static_without_bzip2_compress
> ---
> Current distrib/utils/x_gzip is:
> ---
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 100 100 145758 Mar 27 20:08 x_gzip-static
> ---
> Is this difference worth? Now distrib/utils/x_gzip should only have
> Makefile with some CPPFLAGS which disables unneeded features?
Unless it's the same size we need to leave x_gzip. On areas cramped for space
this just barely fits.
James
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index