On May 22, 2004, at 7:19 AM, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
No, atabus and umass are at the same level in the config herarchy.Both offer a way to transfer data from/to a wd device, but do it in a differentway: atabus drive the wd device directly from its register, while umass talks to a ata/usb bridge which hide the ATA registers from us.
FWIW, I have always disagreed with this approach. I would prefer that atabus by a common midlayer for all ATA controllers, the same way scsibus is for SCSI controllers.
At Wasabi, we are working on fixing this, and hope to release some code soon (it's not quite finished yet).
-- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej%wasabisystems.com@localhost>
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part