On Jun 22, 2004, at 12:23 PM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
Jim Wise <jwise%draga.com@localhost> writes:Is this tool _really_ a necessary part of the PF import? It conflicts in name with a much more widely used spam tool which a _lot_ of NetBSD users are using from pkgsrc.If we keep this, it should be renamed to avoid this conflict, such as topf-spamd.There are plenty of programs with conflicting names. That's why you use absolute paths in scripts.
Amazingly, I agree with Jim :-)If this is truly part of PF, then it should have a pf* name like all of the other PF-related tools do.
If it is NOT part of PF, then it should go through a separate approval process.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej%wasabisystems.com@localhost>
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part