On Jan 11, 2005, at 1:29 PM, Luke Mewburn wrote:
I am not sure that MKPAM should be set to "yes" at this time, given that <manu> set MKPAM=no after discussion with a few of us, at least until we knew that the PAM integration was stable enough to use. I.e, I think this change should be backed out. (Or all of rev 1.431 removed)
MKPAM should be set to "yes". USE_PAM should be set to "no".
-- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej%shagadelic.org@localhost>
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part