Jim Wise <jwise%draga.com@localhost> writes: >>| Probably a dumb question, but: why? >> >>Because it was not there before, and it could be that KRB4 should >>be deprecated for the 2.0 protocol? > > I guess that my feeling is that if someone is still using krb4 in this > day and age, he is probably doing so for a reason (AFS interoperability > comes immediately to mind). All users of AFS should have switched to using 524 and 2b yestoday. Kerberos V4 is a dead, make its death be honorable. Love
Attachment:
pgpjMG1XtTJln.pgp
Description: PGP signature