Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev/acpi

[Jason Thorpe <thorpej%shagadelic.org@localhost>]

On Dec 12, 2005, at 4:59 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:

> You mean MI code? MachDep is just that. In this particular case,  
> not every
> machine has ACPI. To compare, how about a machine that has  
> turbochannel and
> needs a sysctl? I think that the precedence is hw.*, right?

Where do other devices get inserted into the tree?

Anyway, I think hw.acpi.root might be OK.  Would allow for other ACPI  
nodes to be added later.

-- thorpej