Hubert Feyrer <hubert@feyrer.de> writes:
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Simon Burge wrote:
>> Isn't this exactly what very old progress(1) did, and new progress(1)
>> does now, as described in the PR?
>
> Indeed.
> Perry, maybe have a look at the program, before and after the change.

I'm sorry, but your commit message said:

> > Instead of reporting some bogus values, print no progress at all.

I interpreted "print no progress at all" in the obvious way. Perhaps
you should update the commit message.

Perry