On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
In your opinion, should we move more of NetBSD into pkgsrc? If so, how do we handle maintenance of first party software in pkgsrc?If by "first party software" you mean what we have in base today (and what wasn't imported from random places), then I'd say: not at all.
No, by "first party software" I mean the web server that was written and imported (as I gathered from reading the rest of this thread) with the intent of doing ongoing development and maintenance in the NetBSD tree.
My question remains.
Have (keep/get) a small core system, and add the rest via a packaging system.
So we should move more to pkgsrc? Where do you draw the line? Cheers, Jraed