Re: CVS commit: src

[Havard Eidnes <he%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

> Module Name:  src
> Committed By: pooka
> Date:         Tue Aug  5 14:42:04 UTC 2008
>
> Modified Files:
>       src/distrib/sets/lists/base: shl.elf shl.mi
>       src/distrib/sets/lists/comp: mi shl.mi
>       src/sys/rump/fs: Makefile.rumpfs
> Added Files:
>       src/sys/rump/fs/lib/libcd9660: Makefile shlib_version
>       src/sys/rump/fs/lib/libmsdos: Makefile shlib_version
> Removed Files:
>       src/sys/rump/fs/lib/libcd9660fs: Makefile shlib_version
>       src/sys/rump/fs/lib/libmsdosfs: Makefile shlib_version
>
> Log Message:
> Maintain consistency of naming between the rumpfs library name and
> the MOUNT_FOOFS name.  Don't bother polluting the obsolete lists
> with the original names since they were in only for a few days.

For those who built in this time window, and want to do UPDATE builds,
they will now have to manually remove the following files from their
DESTDIRs:

./usr/lib/librumpfs_cd9660fs.a
./usr/lib/librumpfs_cd9660fs.so
./usr/lib/librumpfs_cd9660fs.so.0
./usr/lib/librumpfs_cd9660fs.so.0.0
./usr/lib/librumpfs_cd9660fs_p.a
./usr/lib/librumpfs_cd9660fs_pic.a
./usr/lib/librumpfs_msdosfs.a
./usr/lib/librumpfs_msdosfs.so
./usr/lib/librumpfs_msdosfs.so.0
./usr/lib/librumpfs_msdosfs.so.0.0
./usr/lib/librumpfs_msdosfs_p.a
./usr/lib/librumpfs_msdosfs_pic.a

This could have been avoided if we had marked these files as obsolete
instead.

Personally I think more care should have been given to the initial
choice of naming, and I also think it is slightly unfriendly not to
make use of this automatic mechanism to preserve UPDATE-buildability.

Regards,

- Håvard