Re: changing NetBSD's view of npf's canonical location

[Christoph Badura <bad%bsd.de@localhost>]

On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 08:47:43AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> I think that NetBSD should document an unmaintained repo as upstream,
> because it suggests that every change to our tree should be filed as a
> PR upstream.  That doesn't seem like a good use of time, adding friction
> without benefit.  Looking at upstream, I see very little origining
> outside of NetBSD since about 2020.


I guess you meant "I think that NetBSD should *not* document an unmaintained
repo as upstream."

I guess you proposal makes some sense.  Personally, I don't care much
either way.

I think we should sync our sources from the upstream version to pick up
the changes that aren't in-tree and continue from there.

With the git export, pulling out changes and submitting them upstream is
not difficult.

--chris