Subject: Re: (a)sh command line editting and history patch.
To: Luke Mewburn <lukem@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>
From: Gandhi woulda smacked you <greywolf@starwolf.com>
List: tech-misc
Date: 04/25/1999 09:51:30
On Sun, 25 Apr 1999, Luke Mewburn wrote:
# Bill Sommerfeld writes:
# > > can tcsh? when? :-)
# >
# > zsh can.. :-)
# ^ core dump on you a lot
#
# (yes, i know zsh can do multiline editing; this was one of the few reasons
# i almost converted from tcsh to zsh. i hacked $rprompt into tcsh so the
# other reason was moot :). when i looked at zsh last it still coredumped
# more frequently than i prefer in a shell. tcsh might be krusty, but
# it's generally more stable and less bloated than the other popular
# featureful shells (bash & zsh))
I'm noticing, though, that bash seems to run more quickly than tcsh;
I thought I'd give it a try. Of COURSE it's going to be a bit more
bloated: it's trying to handle constructs from the csh and ksh
worlds at the same time. I suspect that the readline library
adds a bit as well (128k+, it looks like).
--*greywolf;
(yes, the self-same idiot that argue[ds]
for csh as a default root shell)
--
_________________________ _________________________
| NEW HAMPSHIRE | | NEW HAMPSHIRE |
| | | |
| # # ##### ##### ### | | # #### #### #### |
| ## # # # # # | | ## # # # # # |
| # # # ### # ## | | # # #### ### # # |
| # ## # # # | | ##### # # # # # |
| # AT&T### # ##### | | # #### #### #### |
| LIVE ^ FREE OR DIE | | LIVE FREE OR DIE |
`-------------------------' `-------------------------'