Subject: Re: (a)sh command line editting and history patch.
To: Luke Mewburn <lukem@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>
From: Gandhi woulda smacked you <greywolf@starwolf.com>
List: tech-misc
Date: 04/25/1999 09:51:30
On Sun, 25 Apr 1999, Luke Mewburn wrote:

# Bill Sommerfeld writes:
# > > can tcsh?  when?   :-)
# > 
# > zsh can.. :-)
#          ^ core dump on you a lot
# 
# (yes, i know zsh can do multiline editing; this was one of the few reasons
# i almost converted from tcsh to zsh. i hacked $rprompt into tcsh so the
# other reason was moot :). when i looked at zsh last it still coredumped
# more frequently than i prefer in a shell. tcsh might be krusty, but
# it's generally more stable and less bloated than the other popular
# featureful shells (bash & zsh))

I'm noticing, though, that bash seems to run more quickly than tcsh;
I thought I'd give it a try.  Of COURSE it's going to be a bit more
bloated:  it's trying to handle constructs from the csh and ksh
worlds at the same time.  I suspect that the readline library
adds a bit as well  (128k+, it looks like).

				--*greywolf;
				(yes, the self-same idiot that argue[ds]
				 for csh as a default root shell)
--
     _________________________   _________________________ 
    |     NEW HAMPSHIRE       | |     NEW HAMPSHIRE       |
    |                         | |                         |
    | #   # ##### #####  ###  | |    #  ####   #### ####  |
    | ##  # #       #   #   # | |   ##  #   # #     #   # |
    | # # # ###     #     ##  | |  # #  ####   ###  #   # |
    | #  ## #       #    #    | | ##### #   #     # #   # |
    | #   AT&T###   #   ##### | |    #  ####  ####  ####  |
    | LIVE ^  FREE   OR   DIE | | LIVE    FREE   OR   DIE |
    `-------------------------' `-------------------------'