Subject: re: SUBDIR_CHANGE (Was: SUBDIR_EXCLUDES)
To: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
From: Paul Goyette <paul@whooppee.com>
List: tech-misc
Date: 08/11/2000 17:49:14
Hmmm. Sounds useful. But wouldn't it be more useful if we could set it
to a list of _paths_ rather than just a single directory? There's at
least a couple of places in the source tree where there are common names
lib/libc and regress/libc come to mind immediately. It might be nice to
be able to SUBDIR_EXCLUDE regress/libc ...
Just a thought.
On Sat, 12 Aug 2000, matthew green wrote:
>
> This sounds... interesting. Certainly I would be happy to see
> it in the tree. Would anyone have any objections?
>
>
> i much prefer the concept of "SUBDIR_EXLUCDE"; i can set that on
> the make command line and that makes it 100x more useful.
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Paul Goyette | PGP DSS Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| Network Engineer| BCD7 5301 9513 58A6 0DBC | paul@whooppee.com |
| & kernel hacker | 91EB ADB1 A280 3B79 9221 | pgoyette@juniper.net |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------