Subject: Re: Third party source [was re: airport codes.]
To: None <tech-misc@netbsd.org>
From: None <jchacon@genuity.net>
List: tech-misc
Date: 10/25/2000 15:22:39
However cvs isn't required for "self hosting".

The compiler, sure. CVS?? That's just there for people doing direct development
and I agree shouldn't be in the tree.

James

>
>[ On Sunday, October 22, 2000 at 13:04:55 (-0400), John Hawkinson wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: Third party source [was re: airport codes.]
>>
>> But not all users are developers (lowercase 'd'), by a long shot, and
>> including developer-only tools that developers can easily get from pkgsrc
>> is hardly compelling.
>
>That way lies total madness.  The proof is available in any proprietary
>OS distribution I've ever worked with.
>
>Any OS available in source should be 100% totally self-hosting (though
>cross-build support is of course a highly desirable attribute too!).
>
>-- 
>							Greg A. Woods
>
>+1 416 218-0098      VE3TCP      <gwoods@acm.org>      <robohack!woods>
>Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>
>
>
>
>