Subject: Re: ipnat - rdr rules
To: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr>
From: Al B. Snell <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
List: tech-misc
Date: 02/26/2001 18:09:18
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Manuel Bouyer wrote:

> Yes, I think it'll do what you want here:
> bimap fxp0 10.3.0.2/32 -> 1.2.3.70/32
> bimap fxp0 10.3.0.3/32 -> 1.2.3.71/32
> bimap fxp0 10.3.0.4/32 -> 1.2.3.73/32
> 
> Or maybe it's reversed:
> bimap fxp0 1.2.3.70/32 -> 10.3.0.2/32
> bimap fxp0 1.2.3.71/32 -> 10.3.0.3/32
> bimap fxp0 1.2.3.73/32 -> 10.3.0.4/32

Cool... I will try that, and see how I get on.

> You're rigth, it's not very well explained :)

When I'm done, I'll look in CVS to see who deals with
/usr/share/examples/ipf and ask if they'd like my configuration as an
example. It must be quite common to be running a transparent firewall...

> Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>

ABS

-- 
                               Alaric B. Snell
 http://www.alaric-snell.com/  http://RFC.net/  http://www.warhead.org.uk/
   Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software